<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What part of &#8220;self-explanatory&#8221; don&#8217;t you understand?</title>
	<link>http://www.petemandik.com/blog/2008/04/07/what-part-of-self-explanatory-dont-you-understand/</link>
	<description>Pete Mandik's Intermittently Neurophilosophical Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tanasije Gjorgoski</title>
		<link>http://www.petemandik.com/blog/2008/04/07/what-part-of-self-explanatory-dont-you-understand/#comment-230153</link>
		<author>Tanasije Gjorgoski</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.petemandik.com/blog/2008/04/07/what-part-of-self-explanatory-dont-you-understand/#comment-230153</guid>
		<description>Half serious...
Wouldn't self-explanatory be even more radical version of Given? Not just that the phenomenon is given to us qua that phenomenon, but also the explanation for it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Half serious&#8230;<br />
Wouldn&#8217;t self-explanatory be even more radical version of Given? Not just that the phenomenon is given to us qua that phenomenon, but also the explanation for it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
